The Multan Electric Power Company (MEPCO) has recently dismissed two of its employees after internal investigations revealed serious misconduct. The dismissed employees include a Sub-Divisional Officer (SDO) and an assistant lineman. Their termination was a result of their involvement in fraudulent activities and electricity theft, which were uncovered during official inquiries.
| Employee | Misconduct |
| Saf Yousuf | Fraudulent documents |
| Liaquat Hussain | Electricity theft and meter tampering |
These actions reflect MEPCO’s commitment to maintaining strict discipline and transparency within its workforce.
Contents
Misconduct by the Sub-Divisional Officer
Saf Yousuf, acting as a line superintendent grade-I and SDO of City Subdivision Chishtian, was dismissed due to fraudulent practices. Investigations revealed that he had produced false documents during his service at MEPCO, LESCO, and IESCO. His case was brought to the attention of the Lahore High Court Multan Bench, which resulted in his termination. This case highlights the significant consequences for employees involved in unethical practices.
Related Also: MEPCO Provides 26 Bucket-Mounted Vehicles for Line Staff Safety and Project Completion
Assistant Lineman’s Involvement in Electricity Theft
Assistant Lineman Liaquat Hussain, stationed at Industrial Estate Subdivision Mian Channu, was also dismissed. He was found guilty of being involved in electricity theft and tampering with meters, which is a serious offense under the Pakistan WAPDA Employees E&D Rules, 1978. His misconduct was identified during his time at the Abdul Hakeem Subdivision, and an inquiry led to his termination.
Highlighting the Key Issues
- Both employees were involved in different types of misconduct: document fraud and electricity theft.
- MEPCO conducted thorough investigations before taking action.
- The Lahore High Court Multan Bench played a role in the termination of the SDO.
- The company’s strong stance reflects its dedication to upholding integrity in its operations.
Importance of Transparency in Public Service
These cases underscore the importance of maintaining transparency and accountability within public service roles. Employees in positions of authority must adhere to strict ethical standards to ensure public trust is not eroded. MEPCO’s decision to take strong disciplinary action is aimed at safeguarding its reputation and deterring future misconduct.
Also Read: BIG NEWS: Defaulter and Armed Men Attack MEPCO Recovery Team in Lodhran
Conclusion
MEPCO’s decision to dismiss these employees serves as a clear message that any form of misconduct will not be tolerated. By taking swift and decisive action, MEPCO aims to maintain a transparent and disciplined working environment, ensuring that both the public and internal operations remain protected from unethical behavior.
FAQs
What were the specific charges against the SDO?
The SDO was involved in submitting fraudulent documents during his service at multiple power companies, leading to his dismissal.
Why was the assistant lineman terminated?
The assistant lineman was terminated for electricity theft and tampering with meters, which violated company policies and national regulations.
How does MEPCO handle employee misconduct?
MEPCO conducts thorough internal investigations and ensures that any form of misconduct is dealt with strictly, in accordance with company policies and national laws.